SYDNEY – The former head of the United States’ Central Intelligence Agency Michael Hayden said Friday it “goes without saying” that Chinese telecoms giant Huawei spies for Beijing.
Speaking to the Australian Financial Review, Hayden claimed China was engaged in unrestricted espionage against the West and said it was his belief that Huawei would have shared information with state agencies.
Asked whether Huawei represented an unambiguous national security threat to the US and Australia, Hayden replied: “Yes, I believe it does”.
Britain, the United States and Australia have all raised concerns that Huawei’s alleged ties to the Chinese state could see telecoms equipment supplied by the company used for spying and cyber-attacks.
Huawei denies it has any direct links to the Chinese state, but the US Congress last year called for its exclusion from US government contracts and it was also barred from bidding for contracts to build Australia’s national broadband network.
The retired general said he believed Western intelligence networks had hard evidence that Huawei had spied on behalf of the Chinese state.
“I have no reason to question the belief that’s the case,” said Hayden, who retired from the CIA in 2009 and who prior to that served as head of the National Security Agency (NSA).
“That’s my professional judgement. But as the former director of the NSA, I cannot comment on specific instances of espionage or any operational matters.
“And, at a minimum, Huawei would have shared with the Chinese state intimate and extensive knowledge of the foreign telecommunications systems it is involved with. I think that goes without saying.”
Huawei’s John Suffolk, who has previously described the company as the “piggy in the middle” of the broader dispute over hacking between China and the United States, reportedly dismissed Hayden’s comments as tired, unsubstantiated and defamatory.
“It’s time to put up or shut up,” Suffolk, Huawei’s global cyber security officer, told the newspaper.
Hayden said Huawei had approached him several years ago to be on the firm’s American board, but it had failed to convince him it should be involved in critical communications infrastructure.
“This is not blind prejudice on my part. This was my considered view based on a four-decade career as an intelligence officer,” he said.
“My conclusion was that, ‘No, it is simply not acceptable for Huawei to be creating the backbone of the domestic telecommunications network in the United States, period.’
“And frankly this is where I think the state has a role to play — to ensure we don’t make decisions that compromise the foundations of our national security.”
Related: Huawei Founder Breaks Silence to Reject Security Concerns
Related: PLA Concerns Lead to Huawei Being Blocked in Australia
Related: Huawei Calls for Global Security Standards
Related: China’s Huawei Responds to US Hackers
Related: China’s Huawei to Curb Business In Iran
Insight: A Convenient Scapegoat – Why All Cyber Attacks Originate in China

More from AFP
- Cyberattacks Target Websites of German Airports, Admin
- Meta Slapped With 5.5 Million Euro Fine for EU Data Breach
- International Arrests Over ‘Criminal’ Crypto Exchange
- France Regulator Raps Apple Over App Store Ads
- More Political Storms for TikTok After US Government Ban
- Meta Hit With 390 Million Euro Fine Over EU Data Breaches
- Facebook Agrees to Pay $725 Million to Settle Privacy Suit
- China’s ByteDance Admits Using TikTok Data to Track Journalists
Latest News
- Russian Millionaire on Trial in Hack, Insider Trade Scheme
- British Retailer JD Sports Discloses Data Breach Affecting 10 Million Customers
- Vulnerabilities in OpenEMR Healthcare Software Expose Patient Data
- Russia-Linked APT29 Uses New Malware in Embassy Attacks
- Meta Awards $27,000 Bounty for 2FA Bypass Vulnerability
- The Effect of Cybersecurity Layoffs on Cybersecurity Recruitment
- Critical Vulnerability Impacts Over 120 Lexmark Printers
- BIND Updates Patch High-Severity, Remotely Exploitable DoS Flaws
