Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


Network Security

NIST Readies to Tackle Internet’s Global BGP Vulnerabilities

NIST has published an update on its work on the new Secure Internet Domain Routing (SIDR) standards designed to provide the internet the security that is currently lacking from the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP).

NIST has published an update on its work on the new Secure Internet Domain Routing (SIDR) standards designed to provide the internet the security that is currently lacking from the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP).

BGP was designed in 1989 as a short-term fix for the earlier Exterior Gateway Protocol that could no longer handle the rapidly increasing size of the internet, and was in imminent danger of meltdown. The problem is that BGP was designed without any security, despite it being fundamental to the operation of the internet.

BGP controls the route that data takes from source to destination. It does this by keeping tabs on the availability of local stepping stones along that route. The availability of those stepping stones is maintained in regularly updated routing tables held locally. The problem is that there is no security applied to those tables — in effect, the entire map of the internet is built on trust; and trust is in short supply in today’s internet. Whole swathes of traffic can be hijacked.

“BGP forms the technical glue holding the internet together,” explains NIST in Tuesday’s post; “but historically, its lack of security mechanisms makes it an easy target for hacking.”

The trust model underpinning BGP is easily abused, and has frequently been abused. Generally speaking, most abuse is thought to have be accidental — but there have been enough suspicious incidents to demonstrate that the theoretic concern over BGP’s security is not unfounded. Since the routing tables are locally stipulated and internationally distributed, a telecommunications company in one country is able to change the data routing for the entire world.

“As a result,” warns NIST in a separate publication (SIDR, Part 1: Route Hijacks– PDF), “attacks against internet routing functions are a significant and systemic threat to internet based information systems. The consequences of these attacks can: (1) deny access to internet services; (2) detour internet traffic to permit eavesdropping and to facilitate on-path attacks on endpoints (sites); (3) misdeliver internet network traffic to malicious endpoints; (4) undermine IP address-based reputation and filtering systems; and (5) cause routing instability in the internet.”

One of the best known examples of route hijacking occurred in February 2008 when a Pakistani ISP tried to block YouTube after the government deemed a video depiction of Muhammad to be offensive. Its attempts to hijack YouTube deliveries to Pakistan effectively hijacked the world’s YouTube making it virtually inaccessible anywhere. While the intent was intended, the result probably wasn’t — but other examples appear to be more clearly malicious.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

In April of this year, 36 large network blocks were hijacked by the Russian government-controlled Rostelecom company. Researchers concluded that the BGP tables had been altered manually, probably at or by Rostelecom. What made it suspicious was the high concentration of technology and financial services companies that were included: such as MasterCard, Visa, HSBC and Symantec. 

Because of the changes made to the BGP routing tables, traffic flowing into the affected networks was rerouted through Rostelecom’s routers. “I would classify this as quite suspicious,” said Dyn’s Doug Madory at the time. “Typically accidental leaks appear more voluminous and indiscriminate. This would appear to be targeted to financial institutions.”

Other examples include a scheme that ran for months in 2014 redirecting traffic within the Bitcoin infrastructure and resulting in the theft of $83,000 in Bitcoins; and a 2013 attack that detoured bank, telephony, and government data through routers in Belarus and Iceland.

While known BGP abuses have been relatively small in scope and limited in duration — and sometimes accidental — the vulnerabilities are real. “The fact that they haven’t been dramatically exploited yet shouldn’t make you feel better,” warns NIST’s Doug Montgomery. “Think of how much of our critical infrastructure relies on internet technology — transportation, communication, financial systems, et cetera. Someday, someone will have the motivation.”

NIST has been working with the DHS and IETF to develop a new set of BGP standards that will eliminate the problems. “The set of standards, known as Secure Inter-Domain Routing (SIDR), have been published by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) and represent the first comprehensive effort to defend the internet’s routing system from attack,” wrote NIST yesterday.

There are three separate components that comprise SIDR: Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI); BGP Origin Validation (BGP-OV); and BGP PATH Validation (BGP-PV). RPKI allows third-parties to cryptographically validate claims to ownership of internet address blocks and internet autonomous systems. Origin Validation provides protocol extensions and tools to allow BGP routers to use RPKI data to detect and filter unauthorized BGP route announcements. PATH Validation provides further protocol extensions that allow BGP routers to cryptographically verify the sequence of networks (the autonomous systems path) that comprise a BGP route.

The Origin Validation will deter simple route hijack attacks and misconfigurations (accidents), while PATH Validation will deter more sophisticated and stealthy route detour attacks. Together, says NIST, they provide a complete solution to the routing vulnerabilities identified in the original BGP.

Specifications for the three components are now complete. The third component — PATH Validation, also known as BGPsec — was published by IETF as RFC 8205 in September. Uptake, however, is a different matter. The first of the components (RPKI) is defined in RFC 6480 published in February 2012. By 2016, although all five Regional Internet Registries (RIRs — AFRINIC, ARIN, APNIC, LACNIC and RIPE NCC) were RPKI able, adoption of route origin authorizations had been slow and patchy. ~7% of global BGP announcements were then covered by ROAs. RPKI adoption in Europe (~30% of its announced address space covered by ROAs) and Latin America (~13% of its announced address space covered by ROAs) was proceeding much faster than in North America (~3% of its announced address space was then covered by ROAs). 

With the specification for the final SIDR component in place, NIST will now redirect its efforts. “With their publication,” says the NIST announcement, “NIST’s efforts will shift to helping the industry with adoption, including developing technical deployment guidance as well as working on improving the performance and scalability of implementations. As part of this technology transition effort, NIST’s National Cybersecurity Center of Excellence (NCCoE) recently announced plans for a new project focused on Secure Inter-Domain Routing.”

With SIDR, the 1989 temporary internet fix known as BGP is finally gaini
ng security. Whether it can be globally implemented before a serious and well-resourced BGP attack disrupts the entire internet remains to be seen. As Montgomery said, “Someday, someone will have the motivation.”

Written By

Kevin Townsend is a Senior Contributor at SecurityWeek. He has been writing about high tech issues since before the birth of Microsoft. For the last 15 years he has specialized in information security; and has had many thousands of articles published in dozens of different magazines – from The Times and the Financial Times to current and long-gone computer magazines.

Click to comment

Daily Briefing Newsletter

Subscribe to the SecurityWeek Email Briefing to stay informed on the latest threats, trends, and technology, along with insightful columns from industry experts.

SecurityWeek’s Threat Detection and Incident Response Summit brings together security practitioners from around the world to share war stories on breaches, APT attacks and threat intelligence.


Securityweek’s CISO Forum will address issues and challenges that are top of mind for today’s security leaders and what the future looks like as chief defenders of the enterprise.


Expert Insights

Related Content

Identity & Access

Zero trust is not a replacement for identity and access management (IAM), but is the extension of IAM principles from people to everyone and...

Cybersecurity Funding

Network security provider Corsa Security last week announced that it has raised $10 million from Roadmap Capital. To date, the company has raised $50...

Network Security

Attack surface management is nothing short of a complete methodology for providing effective cybersecurity. It doesn’t seek to protect everything, but concentrates on areas...

Identity & Access

Hackers rarely hack in anymore. They log in using stolen, weak, default, or otherwise compromised credentials. That’s why it’s so critical to break the...

Network Security

NSA publishes guidance to help system administrators identify and mitigate cyber risks associated with transitioning to IPv6.


Websites of German airports, administration bodies and banks were hit by DDoS attacks attributed to Russian hacker group Killnet

Application Security

Fortinet on Monday issued an emergency patch to cover a severe vulnerability in its FortiOS SSL-VPN product, warning that hackers have already exploited the...

Network Security

Our networks have become atomized which, for starters, means they’re highly dispersed. Not just in terms of the infrastructure – legacy, on-premises, hybrid, multi-cloud,...