Heartbleed Anniversary: Many Organizations’ External Servers Remain Vulnerable to Cyber Attacks
As we mark the one-year anniversary of disclosure of the now famous OpenSSL vulnerability (CVE-2014-0160) known as Heartbleed, security firm Venafi has released new research that shows how vulnerable Global 2000 organizations still are as a result of the flaw.
According to Venafi’s research, as of April 2015, 74% of organizations have failed to completely remediate the risks around Heartlbeed despite ongoing warnings and guidance from software makers and security industry experts. That number remains nearly unchanged from the 76 percent reported by Venafi as being vulnerable as of August 2014.
To compile its report, Venafi Labs used its cloud-based digital certificate reputation service to evaluate 1,642 Global 2000 organizations with public-facing systems vulnerable to Heartbleed.
While many Global 2000 organizations have taken basic steps to remediate Heartbleed, most have not entirely remediated the vulnerability, Venafi says. In fact, the security firm found that 85 percent these organizations’ external servers remain vulnerable due to the flaw.
“From the start, it was clear that Heartbleed was not just another ‘patch-it’ event,” the report said. “It struck at the core of what creates online trust: SSL keys and certificates. If SSL keys and certificates could be compromised, websites could be spoofed for phishing attacks and encrypted communications decrypted via man-in-the-middle (MITM) tactics resulting in customer data loss and intellectual property theft.”
Venafi has discovered 580,000 hosts belonging to Global 2000 organizations that have not been completely remediated. These partially remediated hosts have been patched against Heartbleed, but the oganizations have either performed, as described by Gartner, “lazy” remediation, failing to replace the private key, or failed to revoke the old certificate, Venafi said.
In 2014, immediately after the Heartbleed vulnerability broke, experts warned about the importance of patching software and replacing SSL keys and certificates.
The vulnerability is “catastrophic” for SSL and Internet security, Bruce Schneier, a well-known cryptologist and CTO of Resilient Systems, told SecurityWeek last April. “On the scale of 1 to 10, this is an 11.” While it’s perfectly possible there are even more serious flaws in TLS lurking undiscovered, Heartbleed is quite possibly the worst one to date. Calling Heartbleed a “ginormous issue” would be a conservative assessment, Schneier said.
In 2014, cybercriminals used the keys and certificates that were captured via Heartbleed in the Community Health Systems breach when attackers accessed 4.5 million patient records. In April 2014, SecurityWeek reported on details of an attack that leveraged the Heartbleed vulnerability against the VPN appliance of a Mandiant customer to hijack multiple active user sessions.
“A year after Heartbleed revealed massive vulnerabilities in the foundation for global trust online, a major alarm needs to be sounded for this huge percentage of the world’s largest and most valuable businesses who are still exposed to attacks like those executed against Community Health Systems,” said Jeff Hudson, CEO, Venafi. “Given the danger that these vulnerabilities pose to their business, remediating risks and securing and protecting keys and certificates needs to be a top priority not only for the IT team alone, but for the CEO, BOD, and CISO.”
Related: Organizations Slow at Patching Heartbleed in VMware Deployments
Related: Heartbleed Vulnerability Still Beating Strong
Related: Recovering from Heartbleed: The Hard Work Lies Ahead
