Legacy systems, safety concerns, and critical infrastructure risks make OT vulnerability disclosure one of cybersecurity's most challenging balancing acts.
As AI-generated code becomes commonplace, CISOs need new audit strategies to measure developer practices, govern AI tool usage, and identify software risks before they reach production.
From model selection and automation to validation and measurable results, the right questions can help enterprises separate genuine AI capabilities from marketing hype.
As cybersecurity platforms embrace agentic AI, organizations must balance detection performance against the escalating costs of token consumption, deployment architecture, and AI credits.
Security teams need more than visibility into AI applications, they need a repeatable framework for monitoring, investigating, and defending them in production.
AI can help attackers generate malware, create malicious payloads, bypass simple security checks, and convert vague malicious intent into functional code.
The organizations best prepared to face disruption are those that align security, continuity and risk management around what the business cannot afford to lose.
For AI data centers, where the stakes are the highest and performance constraints are the tightest, security and performance are no longer a zero-sum game.
Subscribe to the SecurityWeek Email Briefing to stay informed on the latest threats, trends, and technology, along with insightful columns from industry experts.
Learn about Frontier Pace Governance: a practical approach to helping IT operations move at AI speed without sacrificing security, accountability, or operational discipline.
Join as we decipher the world of zero trust and share war stories on securing an organization by eliminating implicit trust and continuously validating every stage of a digital interaction.
As AI accelerates vulnerability discovery and exploitation, so-called virtual patching still comes down to defense-in-depth and strong application security fundamentals.(Joshua Goldfarb)
- AI, supply-chain exposure, quantum computing and geopolitical conflict are testing security programs. Preparing for disruption must become part of day-to-day operations.(Steve Durbin)
Point-in-time audits and sampled assessments offer only snapshots; continuous control monitoring provides evidence that security controls are working today.(Sravish Sridhar)