Artificial Intelligence

Bipartisan Bill Aims to Block Chinese AI From Federal Agencies

The proposal seeks to ban all use of the technology in the U.S. government, with exceptions for use in research and counterterrorism efforts.

DeepSeek malware generation

Legislation introduced Wednesday in Congress would block Chinese artificial intelligence systems from federal agencies as a bipartisan group of lawmakers pledged to ensure that the United States would prevail against China in the global competition over AI.

“We are in a new Cold War, and AI is the strategic technology at the center,” said Republican Rep. John Moolenaar of Michigan, chairman of the House Select Committee on China, as he opened a hearing on the matter. “The future balance of power may very well be determined by who leads in AI.”

About five months ago, a Chinese technology startup called DeepSeek introduced an AI model that rivaled platforms from OpenAI and Google in performance, but cost only a fraction to build. This raised concerns that China was catching up to U.S. despite restrictions on chips and other key technologies used to develop AI.

That race is now a central part of the U.S.-China rivalry, and so much is at stake that the U.S. must win, witnesses told the committee.

The two countries are “in a long-term techno-security competition that will determine the shape of the global political order for the coming years,” said Thomas Mahnken, president and CEO of the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments.

Jack Clark, co-founder and head of policy at Anthropic, said AI has built-in values.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

“I know that AI systems are a reflection of the societies that are built from. AI built in democracies will lead to better technology for all of humanity. AI built in authoritarian nations will … be inescapably intertwined and imbued with authoritarianism,” Clark said. “We must take decisive action to ensure America prevails.”

Earlier this year, Chris Lehane, OpenAI’s head of global affairs, told reporters that the U.S. and China were the only two countries in the world that could build AI at scale. The competition, which he described as one between democratic AI and autocratic AI, is “very real and very serious,” and the stakes are “enormous,” he said, for “the global rails of AI will be built by one of those two countries.”

The 2025 AI Index Report by Stanford University’s Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence center has the U.S. in the lead in producing top AI models. But the report noted China is rapidly closing the performance gap, reaching near parity in 2024 on several major benchmarks. It also showed that China leads in AI publications and patents.

At the hearing, Clark urged the lawmakers to maintain and strengthen export controls of advanced chips to China.

“This competition fundamentally runs on compute,” he said. The U.S. must control the flow of powerful chips to China, Clark said, “or else you’re giving them the tools they will need to build powerful AI to harm American interests.”

Mark Beall, Jr., president of government affairs at The AI Policy Network, said there are “a number of very glaring gaps” in the U.S. export controls that have allowed China to obtain controlled chips. Lawmakers earlier this year introduced a bill to track such chips to ensure they would not be diverted to the wrong hands.

The bill announced Wednesday would ban Chinese AI systems in the federal government. Sponsors are Reps. Ritchie Torres, D-N.Y., and Darin LaHood, R-Ill., and Sens. Rick Scott, R-Fla., and Gary Peters, D-Mich.

“The U.S. must draw a hard line: hostile AI systems have no business operating inside our government,” Moolenaar said.

Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi of Illinois, the committee’s top Democrat, said AI controlled by foreign adversaries “poses a direct threat to our national security, our data and our government operations.”

Some federal agencies and several U.S. states have banned the use of DeepSeek on government devices, but the bill introduced Wednesday would seek to ban all AI systems controlled by foreign adversaries from federal use. How much of this technology is currently being used by federal agencies and offices is unknown, but the legislation would direct the Federal Acquisition Security Council to identify problematic AI systems.

The proposal seeks to ban all use of the technology in the U.S. government, with exceptions for use in research and counterterrorism efforts.

Learn More at the AI Risk Summit

RelatedNew Jailbreak Technique Uses Fictional World to Manipulate AI

RelatedChatGPT, DeepSeek Vulnerable to AI Jailbreaks

RelatedNew CCA Jailbreak Method Works Against Most AI Models

RelatedDeepSeek Compared to ChatGPT, Gemini in AI Jailbreak Test

Related Content

Artificial Intelligence

Rapid7 warns that traditional patch cycles cannot keep pace with soaring vulnerability disclosures and faster exploitation, forcing defenders to prioritize exposure over severity scores.

Artificial Intelligence

The AI security testing firm has shared information on a recently disclosed incident involving Anthropic AI models.

Artificial Intelligence

Anthropic has been conducting tests to identify issues in how AI agents interact with each other.

Artificial Intelligence

The cybersecurity startup will use the fresh investment to scale its product, engineering, sales, and marketing teams.

Artificial Intelligence

Organizations are rushing to implement AI without fully grasping where its legal protections begin and end.

Artificial Intelligence

Corma emerged from stealth with seed funding from Sequoia Capital, Khosla Ventures, and Coatue.

Artificial Intelligence

OpenAI has also announced the expansion of its Daybreak platform to give more organizations access to its AI.

Artificial Intelligence

The current GPT-5.6-Sol has been assigned a ‘high’ cybersecurity threshold, but Astra could reach the maximum ‘critical’ threshold. 

Copyright © 2026 SecurityWeek ®, a Wired Business Media Publication. All Rights Reserved.

Exit mobile version