Security Experts:
Recent articles by Landon Winkelvoss
-
Organizations need to be able to go outside the firewall to gather as much threat actor information as possible to build robust internal defenses against fraud.
-
Fusion centers are able to converge cyber and physical security, close gaps in coverage, and scale security to protect facilities and hundreds of thousands of employees.
-
In the event of Russian cyberwarfare, reviewing the industries, styles, and objectives of their attacks can help organizations to prepare and implement more robust defenses.
-
Many think open source intelligence is just another name for better googling. They are wrong. Good open source and threat intelligence are derived from three core capabilities.
-
Regardless of the type of risk and the adversary you encounter, there are common approaches that will allow enterprises to identify and mitigate those risks.
-
Similar to investigations that disrupt cyberattacks on retailers, the same tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) can be leveraged against those that sell counterfeit or stolen goods.
-
The security industry must commit to a risk-based approach that understands the specific attacks and actors targeting their industry and profile.
-
Conducting scaled and cost-effective attack surface and digital threat monitoring gives organizations of all sizes the best chance of identifying and defeating their adversaries.
-
In addition to evaluating the core capabilities and range of intelligence monitoring, organizations must consider data source integrity, and perhaps most importantly, the level of expert analysis included with each service.
-
Security and intelligence teams often lack finished intelligence, which leaves them ill-equipped to combat motivated and sophisticated adversaries.
-
Executive protection teams face threats from many sources including social media, telephone, email, and event in-person physical threats.
-
Ineffective security approaches when integrating two separate organizations can lead to significant issues that could undercut the business value of a merger or acquisition.
-
While cyber due diligence has yet to become commonplace in M&A transactions, the consequences of failing to identify risks and active campaigns can have costly implications.
-
In response to a specific attack, it’s important to do external threat monitoring and threat actor engagement to determine if the actors are attempting to exploit or monetize the security event.
Get the Daily Briefing
- NSA Cyber Specialist, Army Doctor Charged in US Spying Cases
- North Korean Gov Hackers Caught Rigging Legit Software
- Investors Bet on Ox Security to Guard Software Supply Chains
- More Than Half of Security Pros Say Risks Higher in Cloud Than On Premise
- Details Disclosed After Schneider Electric Patches Critical Flaw Allowing PLC Hacking
- Australia Flags Tough New Data Protection Laws This Year
- Drupal Updates Patch Vulnerability in Twig Template Engine
- Hackers Possibly From China Using New Method to Deploy Persistent ESXi Backdoors
- Auth0 Finds No Breach Following Source Code Compromise
- Multi-Cloud Networks Require Cloud-Native Protection
Copyright © 2022 Wired Business Media. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy