Application Security

US and Allies Update SBOM Guidance

Five years after the initial release, the refresh introduces new elements, removes others, and updates terminology.

SBOM

Government agencies in the US and 13 allied countries this week released updated guidance on the minimum elements of a software bill of materials (SBOM).

Meant to reflect the changes in supply chain security and software transparency, the document builds on the SBOM Minimum Elements guidance that NTIA released in 2021 and takes into consideration comments received during the public feedback period last year.

An SBOM, the authoring agencies say, should serve as a “key building block of software security and supply chain risk management,” helping organizations build accurate inventories of the software and software components within their environments.

In this regard, the updated minimum elements for an SBOM (PDF) guidance provides a baseline of the technologies and practices expected to be included in an SBOM.

“Organizations that produce, procure, and operate software can use SBOM data to better understand their software supply chain. Increased software supply chain visibility can drive risk management decisions, including addressing known and newly discovered vulnerabilities and risks,” the guidance reads.

The updated document preserves the core principles of the 2021 SBOM Minimum Elements while reflecting current SBOM needs. It improves data quality, supports a broader range of use cases and applications, introduces new elements, removes others, and updates descriptions for improved clarity.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

New additions include the Component Hash Algorithm, Component Hash Value, Component License, Author Signature, Data Format Name, Data Format Version, Generation Context, Tool Name, Tool Version, and SBOM Version elements.

While only two elements were removed from the updated guidance, namely Access Control and Software Identification (SWID) Tags, multiple elements were replaced, others were clarified or rewritten, and others were modified to improve data mapping, such as the component name, which now allows multiple entries.

“SBOM tooling has advanced, driven by the growing number of organizations generating, sharing, consuming, and analyzing SBOMs. These advancements enable organizations requesting SBOMs to demand more information about their supply chain and software components than they could have in 2021,” the guidance reads.

According to the authoring agencies, while the document applies to all software, some types of software, such as AI systems and SaaS, may require additional elements. In May, government agencies from Group of Seven (G7) countries released SBOM guidance for AI.

Related: US, Australia Release OT Isolation Guidance for Critical Infrastructure

Related: Are SBOMs Failing? Supply Chain Attacks Rise as Security Teams Struggle With SBOM Data

Related: US Bans Foreign-Made Humanoid Robots, Targeting China Over National Security

Related: How to Conduct a Successful Audit of AI-Driven Software Development

Related Content

Government

Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin tasked CISA with developing the plan in July. 

ICS/OT

Revision 4 of NIST’s operational technology security guide is open for public comments until November 30.

Government

Complementing Zero Trust models, decoys enable organizations to detect, observe, and block malicious activity in their environments.

Government

The White House’s new executive order 14420 widens scrutiny of industrial control systems over cyber sabotage concerns.

Government

The Water Watch Center launched at DEF CON aims to help under-resourced utilities protect their systems against hackers.

ICS/OT

The guidance details steps organizations can take to isolate vital OT and supporting systems, and operate in isolation for an extended period.

Mobile & Wireless

The new Mobile Security Exposure Center creates SBOMs for enterprise mobile apps to uncover vulnerable components, dependencies and hidden risks.

Government

New executive order calls for end-to-end visibility into defense supply chains, including software dependencies, foreign ownership and cyber-related supplier risks.

Copyright © 2026 SecurityWeek ®, a Wired Business Media Publication. All Rights Reserved.

Exit mobile version