Government

UK Moves to Block High-Risk Tech Suppliers From Critical Infrastructure

Late amendments to the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill would give ministers new powers to restrict risky technology providers as supply chain attacks intensify.

UK cybersecurity

The UK Cyber Security and Resilience Bill (CSRB) has been given late amendments specifically targeting the supply chain threat against the nation’s critical infrastructure.

The UK CSRB – not to be confused with the US Cyber Safety Review Board (CSRB) – was introduced to Parliament in November 2025. It has successfully completed all necessary steps through the House of Commons, has moved to the House of Lords (as HL Bill 32) and is now close to receiving Royal Assent. Royal Assent is the point at which the Bill becomes an Act of Parliament and part of UK legislation, where it transitions into the Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Act.

At any time, both a bill and an act can be amended. An example has occurred recently. On August 22, 2026, The Telegraph newspaper reported that Iran-linked adversaries had targeted and forced a small-scale UK energy facility offline for four days. In itself, the attack had no serious effect but did raise questions over the potential effect of wider supply chain attacks on critical industry. 

The government reacted rapidly, and on August 24, 2026, tabled amendments to the CSRB underscoring an urgent need to give ministers powers to prevent (block) critical-sector organizations from using technology suppliers deemed high risk. 

“The confirmation that a UK energy generator was taken offline for four days following a cyber-attack, alongside government moves to widen the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill’s supply chain provisions, brings a long running policy debate into sharp focus. The incident involving the energy generator and the purported involvement of a nation state, has clearly sharpened appetite for the bill’s power to designate critical suppliers, regardless of sector or size,” comments Darren Guccione, CEO and co-founder at Keeper Security.

“This Bill makes a critical distinction – that a hacker who can take a hospital offline, or compromise a water supply isn’t an IT problem, they’re a public safety threat,” adds Shankar Haridas, UK business head at ManageEngine.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Jamie Akhtar, CEO and co-founder at CyberSmart, explains, “The proposed measures are another clear sign that supply chain security is becoming a national resilience issue, as well as a concern for individual businesses. Critical infrastructure organizations may have sophisticated security controls of their own, but their defenses can quickly be undermined if attackers are able to exploit a smaller, less well-protected supplier further down the chain.”

The CSRB already contains stringent requirements, with very strict incident reporting timelines and heavy penalties for failure. Blocking individual companies takes it to a different level. “Attackers rarely go through the front door of a well-defended organization. The majority go through a vendor with lighter security, a managed service provider with standing access, or a supplier nobody has audited in years,” comments Guccione. Keeper’s own research shows that 34% of UK organizations report incidents involving third-party vendors or suppliers.

It’s an interesting approach. Improve the security of the critical infrastructure not by demanding it implements better in-house security, but by disconnecting them from the third-party suppliers they consider to be inadequately secure.

“Many SMEs won’t necessarily think of themselves as part of the UK’s critical infrastructure,” continues Akhtar, “but if they provide technology, services or access to organizations operating in critical sectors, their cyber resilience matters massively. Attackers understand this and will naturally look for the easiest route into their ultimate target.”

He continues, “The Cyber Security and Resilience Bill reflects a wider shift towards greater accountability for third-party risk. Ultimately, the UK’s critical infrastructure is only as resilient as the organizations connected to it, and that means raising the baseline of cybersecurity across the entire supply chain,” concludes Akhtar. 

The supply chain threat is not new, but it continues to grow. The UK’s Cyber Security and Resilience Act will have teeth to force the weak point origin of supply chain attacks to make greater effort to ensure their own security. The target is the supply chain, but the bullseye is the SME origin. So, the message to SMEs serving the UK critical infrastructure is simple: improve your own cybersecurity lest your future profitability be affected by the UK government when the CSRB becomes the CSRA.

Related: Rust Supply Chain Attack Linked to North Korean Hackers

Related: Over 2,500 Organizations Impacted by LiteLLM Supply Chain Attack

Related: Over 400 NPM Packages Infected in ChainDrop Supply Chain Attack

Related: Trump Orders Defense Contractors to Map Software, Suppliers Across Critical Supply Chains

Related Content

ICS/OT

The attack caused real-world operational disruption and raised concerns about the resilience of Britain’s distributed energy infrastructure and the potential for repeatable attacks.

Data Breaches

The root cause of the incident is believed to be a compromised AWS access key that was exposed in publicly available JavaScript build artifacts.

Cybercrime

Thalha Jubair and Owen Flowers were prosecuted over a 2024 cyberattack targeting Transport for London (TfL).

Artificial Intelligence

Two announcements on July 7, 2026, demonstrate the government’s determination to improve the level of cybersecurity within the UK.

Cyberwarfare

The speech is the latest in a string of warnings from intelligence experts that Russia is stepping up hostile activity in a “gray zone”...

Cyberwarfare

British businesses need to prepare themselves to defend against cyberattacks because the U.K. could be targeted “at scale,” if it became involved in an...

Government

The government agency confirmed the vulnerability could have been exploited to obtain company details and alter records.  

Privacy & Compliance

Britain’s data privacy watchdog slapped online forum Reddit on Tuesday with a fine worth nearly $20 million for failures involving children’s personal information.

Copyright © 2026 SecurityWeek ®, a Wired Business Media Publication. All Rights Reserved.

Exit mobile version